BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Prairie Hills Audubon Society - ECPv6.18.3.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Prairie Hills Audubon Society
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://phas-wsd.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Prairie Hills Audubon Society
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Denver
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20250309T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20251102T080000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20260308T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20261101T080000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20270314T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20271107T080000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261102T215000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261102T215900
DTSTAMP:20261102T082855Z
CREATED:20260930T221437Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261102T082855Z
UID:23258-1793656200-1793656740@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Nov 2 Comment deadline --: EPA - Proposed Repeal of Regulations for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under CAA
DESCRIPTION:=== \nMonday\, Nov 2\, 2026\, 9:30–9:59 pm MT — Deadline to comment against EPA’s repeal of all power plant climate pollution limits \nSummary: EPA proposes that Clean Air Act section 111 does not authorize it to regulate emissions from power plants in response to global climate change concerns\, which would require rescinding the Administrator’s contrary findings and determinations in 2015 and repealing all associated 2015 and 2024 GHG standards for coal and gas plants. This follows the February 2026 repeal of the Endangerment Finding. Comment on the authority question itself\, since EPA is not reopening the concurrently published final rule. EPA numbers its questions\, and asks commenters to include the corresponding identifier (e.g.\, “C-1”) when submitting comments relevant to that solicitation.\nDocket: EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124 · RIN 2060-AX00 · 91 FR 59002 (Sept. 17\, 2026)\nFederal Register notice: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-09-17/pdf/2026-19072.pdf\nComment portal: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124. The deadline is Nov 2\, 2026 at 11:59 PM EST.\nEmail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov\, with Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124 in the subject line\nSnail mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\, EPA Docket Center\, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124\, Mail Code 28221T\, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW\, Washington\, DC 20460. Comments must be received by Nov 2\, not just postmarked.\nReady-made alert: NRDC has a comment form at https://action.nrdc.org/letter/5269-PowerPlantReg-091426. It notes that over 26\,000 NRDC supporters already spoke out against rolling back carbon standards for power plants. The other groups on your list (EDF\, Earthjustice\, UCS\, CBD\, Sierra Club) co-filed on earlier rounds\, but I didn’t find their action pages for this round yet. \nHere is the alert for PHAS calendar\, that I have not yet posted\, as the PHAS web site is misbehaving. That happens sometimes and you just have to wait till it starts working.  \nMonday\, Nov 2\, 2026 — Deadline 11:59 pm Eastern (9:59 pm Mountain): Tell EPA not to give up its authority to limit climate pollution from power plants \nThe rule is titled Rescission of the Greenhouse Gas Findings for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants and Repeal of Regulations for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under Clean Air Act Section 111 (Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124). Note: Daylight Saving Time ends Sunday\, Nov 1\, so the deadline is 11:59 pm Eastern Standard Time = 9:59 pm in Rapid City. \nQuick action: pre-written comment forms \n\nNRDC — pre-written letter you can edit and send: https://action.nrdc.org/letter/5269-PowerPlantReg-091426\nEarthjustice — comment form: https://earthjustice.org/action/dont-let-the-epa-gut-this-cornerstone-climate-protection\n\nTip: Please add a sentence or two in your own words (where you live\, a bird or place you love\, drought or fire you have seen). EPA tends to count identical form letters as one campaign; personalized comments carry more weight. \nOr comment directly to EPA\n\nRegulations.gov docket: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124 (look for the September 17\, 2026 “Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking” and click “Comment”)\nFederal Register notice (has a “Submit a formal comment” button): https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-19072\nEmail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov — put “Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124” in the subject line\n\nWhat is happening\nOn Sept. 14\, 2026\, EPA took two actions (published Sept. 17): \n\nA final rule repealing most of the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards — the carbon-capture requirements for existing coal plants\, the requirements for existing gas- and oil-fired steam units\, and the carbon-capture standards for new baseload gas turbines. It takes effect Nov. 16\, 2026. EPA is not taking comment on this part\, and environmental and health groups have already sued.\nA supplemental proposal (open for comment until Nov. 2) that goes much further. EPA proposes that Clean Air Act section 111 never gave it authority to regulate power plant greenhouse gases to address global climate change\, proposes to rescind its 2015 findings that support that regulation\, and proposes to repeal all remaining power plant greenhouse gas standards\, including efficiency standards for new gas turbines and the 2015 standards for new coal units. If finalized\, no federal limit on power plant climate pollution would remain\, and a future EPA would have a much harder time restoring one.\n\nThis builds on EPA’s February 2026 repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding for motor vehicles\, which 24 states and other parties are challenging in the D.C. Circuit. Fossil-fueled power plants produce about a quarter of U.S. climate pollution\, second only to transportation. \nTalking points (pick a few and use your own words)\n\nKeep your comment on EPA’s authority. The open question is whether EPA can regulate power plant climate pollution at all. Say clearly: EPA has that authority and the duty to use it; withdraw the supplemental proposal and keep the 2015 findings.\nThe Clean Air Act already covers climate. The Act’s own definitions say effects on “welfare” include effects on “weather” and “climate.” EPA’s new claim that “air pollution” means only local or regional pollution conflicts with the law Congress wrote.\nThe Supreme Court has already answered this. Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) held greenhouse gases are air pollutants under the Act. American Electric Power v. Connecticut (2011) held that section 111 “speaks directly” to carbon dioxide from power plants\, and on that basis closed the courthouse door to public-nuisance suits against utilities. West Virginia v. EPA (2022) limited how EPA may regulate power plants\, not whether it may.\nDon’t leave the public with no protection at all. If EPA disclaims authority\, polluters get the benefit of court rulings that relied on EPA having that authority\, and the public is left with neither regulation nor a remedy.\nCongress has confirmed the authority. In 2022 Congress added language to the Clean Air Act directing EPA to achieve greenhouse gas reductions from electricity generation “through use of the existing authorities” of the Act. Congress would not have written that if it believed EPA had no such authority.\n“Our share is too small to matter” is not a legal or moral excuse. The U.S. power sector emits more carbon dioxide than most entire nations. The Supreme Court rejected this same “futility” argument in Massachusetts v. EPA: big problems are solved step by step\, and if every large emitter used this excuse\, no one would ever act.\nTiny savings\, huge risk. EPA itself estimates this supplemental proposal would save industry only about $370 million in compliance costs over 20 years. Compare that to the costs of drought\, wildfire\, crop losses\, extreme heat and rising insurance premiums.\nCleaner air for our lungs\, too. Measures that cut carbon dioxide from burning coal and gas also cut soot\, smog-forming pollution and mercury.\nBirds are telling us. National Audubon’s Survival by Degrees study found 64% of North American bird species studied (389 of 604) are moderately or highly vulnerable to climate change\, including 69% of grassland birds and 86% of western forest birds — the birds of our prairies and the Black Hills. Holding warming down greatly improves their odds.\nSouth Dakota & Black Hills impacts. Hotter\, drier summers mean more fire weather and drought stress in Black Hills ponderosa pine forests\, less water in prairie potholes (the “duck factory”) and stock dams\, and harder times for ranchers and farmers. These are exactly the harms to “welfare” the Clean Air Act was written to prevent.\nRegional sources matter. South Dakota’s Big Stone coal plant reports roughly 1.9 million metric tons of greenhouse gases a year to EPA\, and coal plants in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin and North Dakota’s lignite fields are among the region’s largest emitters. Without federal standards\, nothing requires new or rebuilt plants to use the cleaner\, more efficient technology already available.\nDon’t finalize on a shaky foundation. EPA ties this proposal to its 2026 repeal of the Endangerment Finding\, which is under legal challenge. EPA should not stack a second repeal on top of one that may be overturned.\n\nBackground reading\n\nNature World News: EPA repeals most power plant carbon standards\, proposes it has no authority to regulate their climate pollution\nHarvard Environmental & Energy Law Program analysis: https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/epa-repeals-power-plant-carbon-standards/\nEPA rule page: https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/greenhouse-gas-standards-and-guidelines-fossil-fuel-fired-power\nFederal Register notice (PDF): https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-09-17/pdf/2026-19072.pdf\nAudubon\, Survival by Degrees: https://www.audubon.org/our-work/science/survival-degrees/survival-degrees-about-study\n\nPrairie Hills Audubon Society plans to file its own comment letter by the deadline. \n+=================== \n 
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/nov-2-comment-deadline-epa-proposed-repeal-of-regulations-for-power-plant-greenhouse-gas-emissions-under-caa/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR