BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Prairie Hills Audubon Society - ECPv6.18.3.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Prairie Hills Audubon Society
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://phas-wsd.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Prairie Hills Audubon Society
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Denver
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20250309T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20251102T080000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20260308T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20261101T080000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:20270314T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20271107T080000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261101T225000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261101T225900
DTSTAMP:20261030T201422Z
CREATED:20261030T201422Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261030T201422Z
UID:23376-1793573400-1793573940@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Deadline to submit written comments for the Nov. SDGFP Commission meeting
DESCRIPTION:The deadline to submit written comments for the Nov. SDGFP Commission meeting is Sunday Nov 1st just before midnight CT at this web site: https://gfp.sd.gov/forms/positions/. We will post more information about the meeting on our Nov 5-6 event page\, when they post the agenda\, which often doesn’t happen before Friday night or even Monday or Tuesday.
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/deadline-to-submit-written-comments-for-the-nov-sdgfp-commission-meeting/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261102T215000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261102T215900
DTSTAMP:20261102T082855Z
CREATED:20260930T221437Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261102T082855Z
UID:23258-1793656200-1793656740@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Nov 2 Comment deadline --: EPA - Proposed Repeal of Regulations for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under CAA
DESCRIPTION:=== \nMonday\, Nov 2\, 2026\, 9:30–9:59 pm MT — Deadline to comment against EPA’s repeal of all power plant climate pollution limits \nSummary: EPA proposes that Clean Air Act section 111 does not authorize it to regulate emissions from power plants in response to global climate change concerns\, which would require rescinding the Administrator’s contrary findings and determinations in 2015 and repealing all associated 2015 and 2024 GHG standards for coal and gas plants. This follows the February 2026 repeal of the Endangerment Finding. Comment on the authority question itself\, since EPA is not reopening the concurrently published final rule. EPA numbers its questions\, and asks commenters to include the corresponding identifier (e.g.\, “C-1”) when submitting comments relevant to that solicitation.\nDocket: EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124 · RIN 2060-AX00 · 91 FR 59002 (Sept. 17\, 2026)\nFederal Register notice: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-09-17/pdf/2026-19072.pdf\nComment portal: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124. The deadline is Nov 2\, 2026 at 11:59 PM EST.\nEmail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov\, with Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124 in the subject line\nSnail mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\, EPA Docket Center\, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124\, Mail Code 28221T\, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW\, Washington\, DC 20460. Comments must be received by Nov 2\, not just postmarked.\nReady-made alert: NRDC has a comment form at https://action.nrdc.org/letter/5269-PowerPlantReg-091426. It notes that over 26\,000 NRDC supporters already spoke out against rolling back carbon standards for power plants. The other groups on your list (EDF\, Earthjustice\, UCS\, CBD\, Sierra Club) co-filed on earlier rounds\, but I didn’t find their action pages for this round yet. \nHere is the alert for PHAS calendar\, that I have not yet posted\, as the PHAS web site is misbehaving. That happens sometimes and you just have to wait till it starts working.  \nMonday\, Nov 2\, 2026 — Deadline 11:59 pm Eastern (9:59 pm Mountain): Tell EPA not to give up its authority to limit climate pollution from power plants \nThe rule is titled Rescission of the Greenhouse Gas Findings for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants and Repeal of Regulations for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under Clean Air Act Section 111 (Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124). Note: Daylight Saving Time ends Sunday\, Nov 1\, so the deadline is 11:59 pm Eastern Standard Time = 9:59 pm in Rapid City. \nQuick action: pre-written comment forms \n\nNRDC — pre-written letter you can edit and send: https://action.nrdc.org/letter/5269-PowerPlantReg-091426\nEarthjustice — comment form: https://earthjustice.org/action/dont-let-the-epa-gut-this-cornerstone-climate-protection\n\nTip: Please add a sentence or two in your own words (where you live\, a bird or place you love\, drought or fire you have seen). EPA tends to count identical form letters as one campaign; personalized comments carry more weight. \nOr comment directly to EPA\n\nRegulations.gov docket: https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124 (look for the September 17\, 2026 “Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking” and click “Comment”)\nFederal Register notice (has a “Submit a formal comment” button): https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-19072\nEmail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov — put “Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0124” in the subject line\n\nWhat is happening\nOn Sept. 14\, 2026\, EPA took two actions (published Sept. 17): \n\nA final rule repealing most of the 2024 Carbon Pollution Standards — the carbon-capture requirements for existing coal plants\, the requirements for existing gas- and oil-fired steam units\, and the carbon-capture standards for new baseload gas turbines. It takes effect Nov. 16\, 2026. EPA is not taking comment on this part\, and environmental and health groups have already sued.\nA supplemental proposal (open for comment until Nov. 2) that goes much further. EPA proposes that Clean Air Act section 111 never gave it authority to regulate power plant greenhouse gases to address global climate change\, proposes to rescind its 2015 findings that support that regulation\, and proposes to repeal all remaining power plant greenhouse gas standards\, including efficiency standards for new gas turbines and the 2015 standards for new coal units. If finalized\, no federal limit on power plant climate pollution would remain\, and a future EPA would have a much harder time restoring one.\n\nThis builds on EPA’s February 2026 repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding for motor vehicles\, which 24 states and other parties are challenging in the D.C. Circuit. Fossil-fueled power plants produce about a quarter of U.S. climate pollution\, second only to transportation. \nTalking points (pick a few and use your own words)\n\nKeep your comment on EPA’s authority. The open question is whether EPA can regulate power plant climate pollution at all. Say clearly: EPA has that authority and the duty to use it; withdraw the supplemental proposal and keep the 2015 findings.\nThe Clean Air Act already covers climate. The Act’s own definitions say effects on “welfare” include effects on “weather” and “climate.” EPA’s new claim that “air pollution” means only local or regional pollution conflicts with the law Congress wrote.\nThe Supreme Court has already answered this. Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) held greenhouse gases are air pollutants under the Act. American Electric Power v. Connecticut (2011) held that section 111 “speaks directly” to carbon dioxide from power plants\, and on that basis closed the courthouse door to public-nuisance suits against utilities. West Virginia v. EPA (2022) limited how EPA may regulate power plants\, not whether it may.\nDon’t leave the public with no protection at all. If EPA disclaims authority\, polluters get the benefit of court rulings that relied on EPA having that authority\, and the public is left with neither regulation nor a remedy.\nCongress has confirmed the authority. In 2022 Congress added language to the Clean Air Act directing EPA to achieve greenhouse gas reductions from electricity generation “through use of the existing authorities” of the Act. Congress would not have written that if it believed EPA had no such authority.\n“Our share is too small to matter” is not a legal or moral excuse. The U.S. power sector emits more carbon dioxide than most entire nations. The Supreme Court rejected this same “futility” argument in Massachusetts v. EPA: big problems are solved step by step\, and if every large emitter used this excuse\, no one would ever act.\nTiny savings\, huge risk. EPA itself estimates this supplemental proposal would save industry only about $370 million in compliance costs over 20 years. Compare that to the costs of drought\, wildfire\, crop losses\, extreme heat and rising insurance premiums.\nCleaner air for our lungs\, too. Measures that cut carbon dioxide from burning coal and gas also cut soot\, smog-forming pollution and mercury.\nBirds are telling us. National Audubon’s Survival by Degrees study found 64% of North American bird species studied (389 of 604) are moderately or highly vulnerable to climate change\, including 69% of grassland birds and 86% of western forest birds — the birds of our prairies and the Black Hills. Holding warming down greatly improves their odds.\nSouth Dakota & Black Hills impacts. Hotter\, drier summers mean more fire weather and drought stress in Black Hills ponderosa pine forests\, less water in prairie potholes (the “duck factory”) and stock dams\, and harder times for ranchers and farmers. These are exactly the harms to “welfare” the Clean Air Act was written to prevent.\nRegional sources matter. South Dakota’s Big Stone coal plant reports roughly 1.9 million metric tons of greenhouse gases a year to EPA\, and coal plants in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin and North Dakota’s lignite fields are among the region’s largest emitters. Without federal standards\, nothing requires new or rebuilt plants to use the cleaner\, more efficient technology already available.\nDon’t finalize on a shaky foundation. EPA ties this proposal to its 2026 repeal of the Endangerment Finding\, which is under legal challenge. EPA should not stack a second repeal on top of one that may be overturned.\n\nBackground reading\n\nNature World News: EPA repeals most power plant carbon standards\, proposes it has no authority to regulate their climate pollution\nHarvard Environmental & Energy Law Program analysis: https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/epa-repeals-power-plant-carbon-standards/\nEPA rule page: https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/greenhouse-gas-standards-and-guidelines-fossil-fuel-fired-power\nFederal Register notice (PDF): https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-09-17/pdf/2026-19072.pdf\nAudubon\, Survival by Degrees: https://www.audubon.org/our-work/science/survival-degrees/survival-degrees-about-study\n\nPrairie Hills Audubon Society plans to file its own comment letter by the deadline. \n+=================== \n 
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/nov-2-comment-deadline-epa-proposed-repeal-of-regulations-for-power-plant-greenhouse-gas-emissions-under-caa/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261103T070000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261103T190000
DTSTAMP:20260930T232302Z
CREATED:20260930T232023Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260930T232302Z
UID:23265-1793689200-1793732400@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Election Day\, Nov 3rd
DESCRIPTION:Election Day\, Nov 3rd \n  \nPlease Vote for candidates of your choice \nPlease  study  Amendment L\, that would make it harder to pass constitutional amendments by ballot measures \nWhat it does: Amendment L would require 60% of the votes cast\, instead of a simple majority\, to amend the South Dakota Constitution. It would apply to every future amendment\, whether it comes from citizens or from the Legislature.
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/election-day-nov-3rd/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261105T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261106T110000
DTSTAMP:20261106T202820Z
CREATED:20261030T201025Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261106T202820Z
UID:23370-1793880000-1793962800@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:SD Game\, Fish and Parks November Meeting 11/5/26-11/6/26\, Sioux Falls and Zoom
DESCRIPTION:SD Game\, Fish and Parks November Meeting 11/5/26-11/6/26\, Sioux Falls and Zoom \nVisit this link for more Zoom and teleconference codes\, agenda and more info.\, when closer to the meeting date: https://gfp.sd.gov/commission/information/ \nAgenda: https://gfp.sd.gov/UserDocs/nav/Commission_Agenda_November_2026.pdf \nZoom Meeting Link | To join via conference call\, dial 1.719.359.4580 | Webinar ID: 1 719 359 4580 | Passcode: 970458 \nhttps://state-sd.zoom.us/j/91264176710?pwd=Vm00NEowdGV6N09Ib1hnVlJkMUF3Zz09#success \n====== \nThere will at least be an Open Forum at about 2 pm CT on Thursday\, where you get 3 minutes to testify on anything. Written comments are due Sunday night by midnight CT – at this web site – https://gfp.sd.gov/forms/positions/
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/sd-game-fish-and-parks-november-meeting-11-5-26-11-6-26-sioux-falls-and-zoom/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261107T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261107T120000
DTSTAMP:20261106T202412Z
CREATED:20261106T182147Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261106T202412Z
UID:23381-1794042000-1794052800@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Nov. 7th\, Morning field trip on "Fire in the Black Hills"\,  Norbeck Society
DESCRIPTION:Nov. 7th\, Morning field trip on “Fire in the Black Hills”\, Norbeck Society\, Chris Stover (Forest Fuels Specialist retired from BHNF) will lead the Field Trip.- \n ** Meet at 9:00 at the Three-Forks parking lot (intersection of Hwy 385 and Hwy 16). We will carpool into the area of interest and make 3 or 4 stops along the way. High clearance & 4-wheel drive are required\, and we need volunteers with suitable vehicles who are willing to take on passengers. The total loop is about 15 miles\, 10 on forest roads. You might enjoy a burger and brew at Cohort Craft Brewery afterwards!  \n** Bring water and snacks and appropriate footwear!  \n** Please RSVP: info@norbecksociety.com  \nLet us know if you are a passenger or a driver 
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/nov-7th-morning-field-trip-on-fire-in-the-black-hills-norbeck-society/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261109T060000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261109T220000
DTSTAMP:20261109T190624Z
CREATED:20261106T210110Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261109T190624Z
UID:23399-1794204000-1794261600@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Expected Monday\, Nov. 9: Senate vote on the permitting bill that would weaken NEPA\, ESA & the Clean Water Act.
DESCRIPTION:Expected Monday\, Nov. 9: Senate vote on the permitting bill that would weaken NEPA\, ESA & the Clean Water Act. Call now\, before the vote.\n\nWhat: The U.S. Senate is expected to hold its first vote as early as Monday on the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act (BAAJA\, S. 5653). This is the cloture vote to open debate\, and it needs 60 votes to pass. The 417-page bill would narrow environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)\, shorten Endangered Species Act consultation deadlines\, limit states’ and Tribes’ authority to put conditions on federal permits under Clean Water Act Section 401\, and weaken National Historic Preservation Act review. It would also fast-track oil and gas\, mining\, logging\, and large AI data centers. \nBefore 2:30 p.m.  Eastern time on Monday\, November 9\, 2026\, please call both of your U.S. Senators (Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121). You should eventually call representative also.  Tell them to strongly oppose S. 5653. If this moves forward\, passing it may take a week (you can keep making calls). \nThe Senate starts meeting at 3:00 pm ET and will vote at 5:30 pm on Monday.  S 5653 is not currently listed on the agenda –  the bill on the agenda is a House Bill – HR 2347…The Surviver Justice Tax Prevention Act.  However HR 2347 is the vehicle they will use to introduce  & vote on S 5653. If cloture vote passes\, they will amend HR 2347 and change it’s content to S 5653.  Using a House already passed bill\, quickens the passage in the House\, during lame duck session.  If it moves forward on Monday night\, it is likely to take several days to move through the process and may be continued for further consideration next week – they don’t meet every day. \nSenate schedules often change\, and the vote could slip to later in the week(s). Calls and re useful any time before the vote\, so don’t wait. Senate offices open at 7 a.m. Mountain / 8 a.m. Central. They also take voice mail messages after hours.  Much of the time \,Thune’s staff doesn’t answer the phone and often all you can do\, 8 to 5\,  is leave messages for him. \nSouth Dakota angle: Sen. Thune\, as Majority Leader\, controls when this vote happens and supports the bill. Rep. Dusty Johnson voted for the House version (the SPEED Act). We don’t expect to change their votes\, but they should hear from South Dakotans\, and the talking points below are aimed at what matters here. \nCall (as an individual constituent): \n\nSen. John Thune: DC (202) 224-2321 | Rapid City (605) 348-7551\nSen. Mike Rounds: DC (202) 224-5842 | Rapid City (605) 343-5035\nRep. Dusty Johnson (if the bill reaches the House): DC (202) 225-2801\nOr the Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121\n\nTalking points. Pick two or three that matter most to you. Calls go better in your own words. \n\nNEPA is how South Dakotans get a voice on Black Hills projects. Timber sales\, mining\, road building\, and grazing on the Black Hills National Forest all go through NEPA review. That review is where citizens\, ranchers\, hunters\, and Tribes find out what’s planned\, comment\, and get mistakes fixed before the damage is done. This bill would reduce the federal actions that require review\, narrow the alternatives agencies have to consider\, and exempt more projects completely. Fewer projects reviewed means fewer chances for local people to weigh in.\nLess time to catch problems\, and less ability to challenge them. The bill sets new deadlines and new limits on court challenges to permitting decisions. When an agency gets it wrong on a public forest\, a citizen challenge is often the only remedy left. Shutting that door rewards rushed decisions.\nMining in the Black Hills. The Black Hills have a long history of mining and its damage\, from Gilt Edge Mine\, now a Superfund site\, to polluted Whitewood Creek. New gold\, lithium\, uranium\, and rare earth mines are proposed in and around the Hills today. The bill is designed to speed approvals for mining. This is exactly where careful environmental review protects our water and saves taxpayers from cleanup bills.\nHistoric preservation and sacred sites. The Black Hills are sacred to the Lakota and other Tribal nations and full of archaeological and historic sites. The bill weakens National Historic Preservation Act review and would waive it for certain reissued nationwide permits. It also weakens Tribal consultation\, which affects South Dakota’s nine Tribal nations. Once a site is bulldozed\, it’s gone for good.\nState authority over our waters. Clean Water Act Section 401 lets South Dakota put water-quality conditions on federal permits for pipelines\, mines\, and other projects crossing our rivers and streams. The bill narrows that authority. Decisions about South Dakota’s water should stay in South Dakota.\nEndangered species. The bill shortens ESA consultation deadlines. The bill would allow states to assume responsibility for federal wildlife reviews\, leaving endangered species with different safeguards depending on where a project is located.  Scientific safeguards would be weakened. Some projects would bypass wildlife review altogether. This all means less careful review for species like the whooping crane\, pallid sturgeon\, and black-footed ferret.\nProject certainty language would lock in permits approved by the Trump administration\, making them nearly impossible for a future administration–even a pro-climate one–to revisit\, even if environmental reviews are flawed\, rushed\, or based on inadequate science.\nFix the real cause of delays. Permitting delays mostly come from understaffed\, underfunded agencies\, not from environmental laws. Fully staffing the Forest Service\, BLM\, and Fish & Wildlife Service would speed permits without cutting the public out.\n\nShort sample message: “I’m a constituent from [town]. Please vote NO on cloture for S. 5653\, the permitting bill. It weakens NEPA review\, which is how South Dakotans get a say on timber\, mining\, and other projects in the Black Hills. It also undercuts historic preservation and protection of sacred sites\, speeds up mining approvals\, and limits South Dakota’s own authority over our waters. Permits are slow mainly because federal agencies are understaffed. The answer is to give agencies the staff and funding they need\, not to cut the public out of decisions about our public lands.” \nHere is another comment suggested by John Muir Project: “Do not be fooled. S. 5653 will not make our lives better or more affordable; it would lay waste to our environment without recourse.  This bill would render the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)\, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) unenforceable in court\, allowing destructive development and energy projects to proceed without restraint even when the law has been violated.  BAAJA also threatens tribal sovereignty and eliminates protections for sacred and cultural sites\, as well as public lands\, waters (yes it further erodes protections under the Clean Water Act)\, and wildlife\, all while stripping away the ability of our communities to have a say in projects that will impact them. It would allow logging\, oil drilling\, and data centers to proceed without regard to their impacts and with no ability to stop them. In fact\, if this law passes\, once a permit is issued\, it would remain locked in for generations to come\, regardless of the impacts\, new science or changed circumstances.” \nFriends and family in other states: The votes that matter most are Democratic senators’ votes\, because 60 votes are needed. Please forward this to people in states with Democratic senators\, especially Oregon (Merkley\, Wyden)\, Illinois (Duckworth)\, Massachusetts (Markey)\, New Mexico\, Colorado\, Arizona\, Nevada\, Washington\, and California. Ask them to call their own senators and urge a NO vote. \nMore information: Western Environmental Law Center statement and policy analysis (https://westernlaw.org/)\, \nOcean Climate Action tool kit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gEvykG50LvO06uBZRt01Mr24m3XrlrEoc8iROMVk5vM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.njmtwcon24f  \n| Bill text and summary (Congress.gov) \n  \n\nDefenders of Wildlife Advocacy Toolkit\nAnimal Commons\, ESC\, and others action alert- https://actionnetwork.org/letters/stop-environmental-rollbacks-in-the-senate-permitting-bill/\nWildEarth Guardians action alert – https://action.wildearthguardians.org/page/104254/action/1?ea.url.id=6217457\nDefenders of Wildlife action alert – https://act.defenders.org/page/103490/action/1\nWestern Watersheds Project action alert-  https://www.westernwatersheds.org/actionalerts/take-action-permitting-reform-would-put-wildlife-and-clean-water-at-risk/\n\n===== \nAdditional Resources\nOrganizational Letters\, Press Releases\, and Statements \n\nLetter – NGO Letter to Congress on Harmful BAAJA Ocean Provisions\nLetter – The Environmental Council of the States\nLetter – Attorney Generals of CA\, MA\, WA\, AZ\, DE\, IL\, ME\, OR\, VT\nLetter- Senators Duckworth\, Wyden\, Merkely\, Markey\nPress Release – WE ACT\nPress Release – Defenders of Wildlife\nPress Release – Center for Biological Diversity\nPress Release – Oil Change International \nPress Release – Southern Environmental Law Center\nStatement\, Refaluwasch Journal of Knowledge and Culture (RJKC)\nPress Release\, The Wilderness Society\nEndangered Species Coalition – https://defenders.org/sites/default/files/2026-10/Permitting-Bill-Advocacy-Toolkit.pdf\n\n  \nNews Articles \n\n\n\nHeatmap\, John Podesta Says Permitting Deal Hands Trump ‘a Loaded Howitzer’\n\n\n\n\nPolitico\, Here’s what’s inside the Senate’s new bipartisan permitting proposal \n\n\nSubstack\, The BAAJA Scorecar – tracks Members of Congress and their support of the bill. \n\n  \nBill Analyses \n\nUnion of Concerned Scientists\, The Senate Permitting Deal Could Lock in Fossil Fuel Dominance for Generations\nFishery Friendly Climate Action Campaign\, The Permitting Bill Fishermen Can’t Afford to Ignore\nBill Analysis\, NRDC\, NRDC Assessment of BAAJA\, the 2026 Permitting and Transmission Bill\n\n\nBill Analysis\, Columbia University\, Senate Bipartisan Permit Reform Bill Would Upend Many Environmental Laws\nBill Analysis\, Holland & Knight\n\n\nBill Analysis\, Jeremy Symons\, Substack\, This is not the permit reform deal that was advertised (Note: this piece includes considerable analysis of Title IV on Project Certainty)\nExpert Blog\, Earthjustice\, What Will BAAJA Do? Whatever the Trump Administration Wants\nExpert Blog\, Earthjustice\, How the Senate’s Permitting Bill Could Lock in Deep-Sea Mining for Years to Come\nExpert Blog\, NRDC – Hard Questions About the Permitting Bill\nExpert Blog\, NRDC – How the Senate’s Permitting Bill Could Lock in Deep-Sea Mining for Years to Come\nExpert Article\, Yale Journal of Regulation\, The Muddy Waters of BAAJA\nLegal Analysis\, David Bookbinder\nFact Sheet\, Oceana\nFact Sheet\, Center for Biological Diversity\nFact Sheet\, Defenders of Wildlife\nFact sheet\, Climate Justice Alliance\, Permitting Reform Myths vs. Facts\n\n 
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/expected-monday-nov-9-senate-vote-on-the-permitting-bill-that-would-weaken-nepa-esa-the-clean-water-act/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261109T153000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261109T160000
DTSTAMP:20261109T185618Z
CREATED:20261106T225739Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261109T185618Z
UID:23405-1794238200-1794240000@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Deadline comment/intervene in 2 ground water right permit applications for Uranium mine
DESCRIPTION:DEADLINE Monday\, Nov. 9: Comment or petition on Powertech’s water permits for the Dewey-Burdock uranium mine (Madison & Inyan Kara aquifers)\nWhat: Powertech (USA) Inc.\, a subsidiary of enCore Energy\, has applied to the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (DANR) for two water permits for its proposed Dewey-Burdock in-situ uranium mine. The mine site is about 20 square miles in southwestern Custer and northwestern Fall River counties\, near Edgemont\, on the southern edge of the Black Hills. DANR received the applications in June but didn’t publish notice until late October\, leaving the public less than two weeks to respond. Comments and petitions are due Monday\, November 9\, 2026. \n\nApplication No. 2914-2\, Inyan Kara Aquifer: Water to mine uranium out of the Inyan Kara formation. Powertech would pump at up to 4\,500 gallons per minute from up to 1\,000 wells. At that rate\, about 2.36 billion gallons a year would pass through the wells\, with net consumption capped at 274.2 acre-feet a year (about 89 million gallons). The notice gives no end date.\nApplication No. 2915-2\, Madison Aquifer: About 82.5 million gallons (253.2 acre-feet) a year for 20 years\, with a possible 20-year extension. The Madison water would mainly be used to try to restore the mined aquifer after mining\, plus facility operations and domestic and livestock water for local ranchers. Powertech’s application calls that a ‘temporary replacement of their wells in the vicinity of ISR operations.’\n\nThe Water Management Board will hear both applications at 10:45 a.m. Central\, Wednesday\, December 2\, 2026\, at the Matthew Training Center\, Joe Foss Building\, 523 E. Capitol Ave.\, Pierre (unless an extension is granted). The Chief Engineer found that the applications raise important public interest issues and should not be approved without a hearing. “The Chief Engineer recommends approving both permits. The Board makes the final decision.” \nWhy it matters: \n\nThe Madison and Inyan Kara are among the main aquifers supplying drinking\, ranch\, and irrigation water across western South Dakota. In-situ mining injects chemicals into the aquifer to dissolve & release uranium and other minerals\, and in-situ mines elsewhere have rarely\, if ever\, returned an aquifer to its pre-mining quality.\nBlack Hills water is already stretched. A 2025 U.S. Geological Survey study found that the region’s aquifers and reservoirs are falling short of demand\, and after years of drought many shallow wells have gone dry.\nA federal appeals court has noted that a sizable number of cultural\, historical\, and archaeological sites\, including burial sites\, have been identified in the project area. The court also found that the Oglala Sioux Tribe has the most direct historical\, cultural\, and religious ties to the area. The Tribe\, Black Hills Clean Water Alliance\, and others have fought this project in state and federal proceedings since at least  2012.\n\nTwo ways to take part (you must file separately for EACH application): \n\nComment: Anyone may comment to the Chief Engineer on DANR’s comment form. A comment goes into the record\, but it does not make you a party to the hearing.\nPetition to intervene: To become a party of record\, you must file a written petition on DANR’s form with both the Chief Engineer and Powertech. You must describe an injury to you that is unique\, not just the general public’s injury. For example\, you might own a well\, land\, or water rights near the site or downgradient from it. The petition must also give your reasons for opposing the application and your name and mailing address. A petitioner may also ask in writing\, by Nov. 9\, to postpone the hearing. Individuals can represent themselves in an intervention\, but corporations must be represented by an attorney.\n\nForms and notices: Go to danr.sd.gov/public\, scroll to the Powertech notice under “Water Rights\,” and click the dates in the “Petition/Comment Deadline” column. You can maybe read the Inyan Kara (2914-2) or Madison (2915-2) hearing notices here and staff reports and company’s applications. You can see comments and petitions already submitted.  However it is possible that parts of this web site will be broken & not work correctly this weekend (11/6-11/9). \nMail\, e-mail or deliver to: \n\n Chief Engineer\, Water Rights Program\, Foss Building\, 523 E. Capitol\, Pierre\, SD 57501. Phone (605) 773-3352.\nPetitioners also need to send a copy to Powertech (USA) Inc.\, 101 North Shoreline Blvd.\, Suite 450\, Corpus Christi\, TX 78401.\nThe mail must be POSTMARKED by 11/9/26.  Also DANR normally has a web portal you can upload comments to\,\n\nDANR WEEKEND WEBSITE ISSUES: However due to talking to DANR on Friday 11/6/26\, I am warned that DANR public notice/public commenting web page may be broken this weekend\, at least in part. DANR has an outage notice on their public notice/comment page that says comments and petitions may also be emailed to DANRmail@state.sd.us (you can’t upload to the DANR web site this weekend/Monday. \nPetitioners must still get a copy of their petition to Powertech and we are provided with postal address for Powertech.. On both applications this is the e-mail for Powertech applicant – aforbes@encoreuranium.com\,  (972) 891-8664\, but I don’t know if that is the proper e-mail to use for sending a petition or it is allowed to e-mail a petition to Powertech. Call up DANR (605) 773-3352 – and ask if you wish to e-mail Powertech or call up  Powertech. It is possible that everyone would rather have digital copies than paper. \nThe deadline for e-mails is  11:59 pm CT (10:59 pm MT).   \nHelp with writing comments: \nBlack Hills Clean Water Alliance has step-by-step filing instructions and commenting hints and videos on how to comment on its State-Level Comment Notices page. —  https://bhcleanwateralliance.org/public-hearings/state-level-comment-notices/ \nDakota Rural Action’s action alert and links to the permit applications and comment pages for each permit are here:\nhttps://www.dakotarural.org/powertech-seeking-billions-of-gallons-of-groundwater-comment-or-intervene-by-nov-9/ \nBackground reading: “Public comment period opens as company seeks state permits for uranium mine” (SD Searchlight / Rapid City Post). Also see the Rapid City Post’s article on declining state aquifers and Brad Johnson’s SD Searchlight commentary\, “With mining\, remember: The people who may need the water in 50 years won’t be at the hearing.” \nSources: \n\nDANR notice of hearing\, Application 2914-2\nSD Searchlight / Rapid City Post: Public comment period opens\nDANR Powertech water rights page
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/deadline-comment-intervene-in-2-ground-water-right-permit-applications-for-uranium-mine/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261109T215000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261109T215900
DTSTAMP:20261109T093536Z
CREATED:20260930T225159Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261109T093536Z
UID:23262-1794261000-1794261540@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Nov 9\, Deadline to comment against fast-track oil drilling permits in Alaska's Western Arctic
DESCRIPTION:Monday\, Nov 9\, 2026\, before 9:59 pm MT — Deadline to comment against fast-track oil drilling permits in Alaska’s Western Arctic (NPR-A) \nSummary: Qualifying oil and gas production sites in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska would get a decision within 60 days of a complete application\, with no additional project-level environmental analysis required. To qualify\, a project’s entire footprint would have to sit within 25 miles of existing permanent oil and gas infrastructure. The proposal came following a formal petition from the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. Earthjustice warns that new projects in the Western Arctic\, including in Teshekpuk Lake\, the Colville River and other special areas that have long been off limits to development\, could be fast-tracked. The impacts analysis is missing: BLM published only a portion of the environmental impact statement for the proposed rule and did not include the section that analyzes its environmental impacts.\nFederal Register notice: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/08/2026-18261/national-petroleum-reserve-in-alaska-production-site-development\nComment portal (rule): https://www.regulations.gov/document/BLM-2026-0133-0001 · RIN 1004-AF57\nDraft EIS chapters (separate comment): Comments on the draft environmental chapters go through the BLM ePlanning site.  Go to –  eplanning.blm.gov; the NEPA Number is DOI-BLM-AK-0000-2026-0012-EIS. \nBoth close on November 9 before midnight in DC.. \nReady-made alert: \nEarthjustice’s press release is at https://earthjustice.org/press/2026/trump-administration-proposes-regulations-to-rubber-stamp-drilling-in-alaskas-western-arctic. \nTheir Pre-fab comment letter – https://earthjustice.org/action/no-shortcuts-for-oil-and-gas-companies?ms=web \nNational Audubon’s action link w/ pre-fab letter: https://act.audubon.org/a/western-arctic-2026 \nAlaska Wilderness League and The Wilderness Society are also active on this issue.\nArticle: “BLM Proposes 60 Day Decisions for Arctic Oil Sites Within 25 Miles of Existing Alaska Infrastructure”  URL link >>https://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/73225/20260907/blm-proposes-60-day-decisions-arctic-oil-sites-within-25-miles-existing-alaska-infrastructure.htm \n.
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/nov-9-deadline-to-comment-against-fast-track-oil-drilling-permits-in-alaskas-western-arctic/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261110T180000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261110T203000
DTSTAMP:20261106T203557Z
CREATED:20261106T201616Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261106T203557Z
UID:23386-1794333600-1794342600@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Jack Gladstone - "Montana's Troubadour" Preforms at the Journey in Rapid City
DESCRIPTION:Jack Gladstone – “Montana’s Troubadour” Preforms at the Journey in Rapid City in the evening.
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/jack-gladstone-montanas-troubadour-preforms-at-the-journey-in-rapid-city/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://phas-wsd.org/wp-content/uploads/Jack-Gladstone-Flyer-Word-Ver-4-FINAL-003.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20261112T180000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20261112T203000
DTSTAMP:20261106T202212Z
CREATED:20261106T201844Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20261106T202212Z
UID:23388-1794506400-1794515400@phas-wsd.org
SUMMARY:Travis Lavieri speaks on Black Footed Ferret - Norbeck Society meeting 11/12/26\, Rapid City
DESCRIPTION:Travis Lavieri speaks on Black Footed Ferret – Norbeck Society meeting 11/12/26. 6 pm presentation at OCW in Rapid City\,
URL:https://phas-wsd.org/event/travis-lavieri-speaks-on-black-footed-ferret-norbeck-society-meeting-11-12-26-rapid-city/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://phas-wsd.org/wp-content/uploads/2026-11-12-Norbeck-presents-Travis-Livieri.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR